Hey y'all:
So, my 15 1/2 year old (step) son is very determinedly trying to talk me into letting him get a bike instead of a car for his first vehicle (he wants a 250.) Here in California, once he turns 15 1/2 and does the MSF course, he can get a learner's permit from the DMV that allows him to ride during the day, on surface streets. He's not permitted to ride at night, on the freeway or to take passengers. These restrictions legally stay in place until he's 16 and can get his actual license.
I'm of two minds on this. On one hand, I LOVE to ride, and the idea of introducing him to the sport and riding together is very appealing. He's also a natural athlete (already 6'1", very coordinated), and I suspect he will quickly develop good skills. Having a bike would also enable him to easily get himself to school, baseball practice, girlfriend's house, etc. We live in a mostly rural area (Topanga Canyon), so most of his riding would be on canyon roads or in the suburbs. I would also take him to do Keith Code's school as soon as he was old enough, so he really knew his fundamentals. And he'd have access to a car when the weather gets crappy (only a short part of the year here in So Cal.)
On the other hand, I know what an idiot I was at that age (I totaled my Toyota pickup at 19, and the only reason I didn't do it sooner was dumb luck.) Although I was more rational than many of my friends, I still liked to show off and took stupid risks. I also partied way too much.
I never had a bike back then though (just for a minute in my early 20s, and I sold it pretty quick.) Riding is a more recent love of mine. I shudder to think of what would have happened had I been on a bike instead of in my car when I had my one serious accident.
Now, my step-son is a pretty level-headed kid, gets good grades, isn't into drugs, and has a much better level of self-awareness than I did at his age. But he's still a TEENAGER, and the words TEENAGER plus MOTORCYCLE kind of freak me out. Even though I'm addicted to my own ride...
So, here are my questions:
Have any of you allowed your kids to start riding on the street at this age? If so, what made you decide to do so? What policies or ground rules did you put in place? And what are the results?
Conversely, have any of you decided NOT to let your kids start riding at this age? If not, why?
I realize that to some of you, this is probably a very stupid question with an obvious answer (LET THE KID RIDE, DAMMIT!) But I don't want to irresponsibly give him the green light on something that he may not really be ready for. I'm sure you parents out there get this. Thanks in advance for your thoughts...
Topangster
So, my 15 1/2 year old (step) son is very determinedly trying to talk me into letting him get a bike instead of a car for his first vehicle (he wants a 250.) Here in California, once he turns 15 1/2 and does the MSF course, he can get a learner's permit from the DMV that allows him to ride during the day, on surface streets. He's not permitted to ride at night, on the freeway or to take passengers. These restrictions legally stay in place until he's 16 and can get his actual license.
I'm of two minds on this. On one hand, I LOVE to ride, and the idea of introducing him to the sport and riding together is very appealing. He's also a natural athlete (already 6'1", very coordinated), and I suspect he will quickly develop good skills. Having a bike would also enable him to easily get himself to school, baseball practice, girlfriend's house, etc. We live in a mostly rural area (Topanga Canyon), so most of his riding would be on canyon roads or in the suburbs. I would also take him to do Keith Code's school as soon as he was old enough, so he really knew his fundamentals. And he'd have access to a car when the weather gets crappy (only a short part of the year here in So Cal.)
On the other hand, I know what an idiot I was at that age (I totaled my Toyota pickup at 19, and the only reason I didn't do it sooner was dumb luck.) Although I was more rational than many of my friends, I still liked to show off and took stupid risks. I also partied way too much.
I never had a bike back then though (just for a minute in my early 20s, and I sold it pretty quick.) Riding is a more recent love of mine. I shudder to think of what would have happened had I been on a bike instead of in my car when I had my one serious accident.
Now, my step-son is a pretty level-headed kid, gets good grades, isn't into drugs, and has a much better level of self-awareness than I did at his age. But he's still a TEENAGER, and the words TEENAGER plus MOTORCYCLE kind of freak me out. Even though I'm addicted to my own ride...
So, here are my questions:
Have any of you allowed your kids to start riding on the street at this age? If so, what made you decide to do so? What policies or ground rules did you put in place? And what are the results?
Conversely, have any of you decided NOT to let your kids start riding at this age? If not, why?
I realize that to some of you, this is probably a very stupid question with an obvious answer (LET THE KID RIDE, DAMMIT!) But I don't want to irresponsibly give him the green light on something that he may not really be ready for. I'm sure you parents out there get this. Thanks in advance for your thoughts...
Topangster