my question is to other superbike owners what do you think of the mv agusta f4?ups n downs?maintaince no differ from ducatis?just wanted to get some info.its a 2009 with 397 miles on it and has 5k in carbon on it .
Sounds like either an F4 1000 312R or an F4 1078 312RR (both were available in 2009).
I have a 1000R and concur with the other posters that mvagusta.net is a good source of information.
In terms of fit and finish the MV is brilliant and maintainence wise they are not much different to Japanese bikes (i.e. very little beyond regular oil changes).
Being a Tamburini design, asthetically they are excellent and there is plenty of thought gone into the assembly and mechanical accessibility of the machine.
There are a few issues, rear wheel hub bearings can fail at quite low mileages parts availibility can be spotty.
Some also complain about off idle hunting and jerkiness however its never bothered me.
There is lots of opinion on overheating, in truth as long as you ride the bike as intended (like you're running for your life) there is no issue, however slow down (<60km/h) or get caught by a few traffic lights will see the temperature go rise dramatically and take ages to recover.
The power is addictive and really needs to be experienced first hand (after 8000 rpm you really need to hang on), remember the MV is one of very few bikes ever sold that will genuinely exceed 300km/h (without modification).
With the standard lightweight wheels and monobloc calipers they steer and stop pretty well too. They do feel a bit top heavy when stopped and the saddle height is more suited to tall people.
Comfort wise they are about the same as a Ducati Superbike.
The MV isn't a Ducati and has a completely different feel:
I find my Ducati (996R) has a more confidence inspiring overall feel and responds to smooth lines and input - a ride (especially at the track) is a series of smooth flowing arcs through the corners with an emphasis on keeping-up corner speed (resulting in lots of knee dragging).
The MV is more raw and brutal and generally I ride mine with more aggression resulting in a ride being largely a series of interconnected straight lines where as the the arrives at a corner I stand it on its nose, haul it around the corner and then as soon as I have it pointing in roughly the right direction I fire it (like a canon) at the next corner (resulting in lots of power wheelies and very little knee dragging).
Frankly neither bike is necessarily better than the other each has its flaws and attractions.
Andrew...