Joined
·
9,712 Posts
i find the rear on the motorcycle to be "chattery," "stiff," and "slightly unstable" at speed over uneven surfaces but improved since a recent suspension clinic visit. i'm fortunate in that my friend "bromike666" has the same model year 999r so here are the pertinent and comparative stats from measurements taken today:
2003 999r "my bike"....i am 176lbs without gear
ohlins 1091-34-100
shock compressed to 10mm preload
-static sag = 6mm
-loaded sag = 28mm
compression: 17 clicks out (i clicked 17 times clockwise til it stopped)
rebound: 11 clicks in (i clicked 11 times counterclockwise til it stopped)
2003 999r "my friend Bromike666's bike"
ohlins 1091-16-64 (much softer spring)
preload: i believe to be 10mm as well
-loaded sag 20mm with ME on it (we didn't measure clicks of rebound or compression as i didn't want to screw with his settings whatsoever). he is heavier than i and achieves much better sag results given his additional weight.
So if our measurements were accurate, i was somehow able to compress his softer spring LESS than my stiffer one. he is able to compress my spring slightly more than i could (again, he is heavier).
everything about the two shock units, linkages, ride height adjusters looked/measured identical to one another, and our swingarms are the same as well. the only thing i couldn't determine were the shock type numbers stamped on the shock towers so to determine if one shock unit was in fact different than the other.
randy at in-house suspension felt that there was something peculiar about the way the bike responded during a recent evaluation (rebounded too quickly, too much gas in the compression unit which he reduced). he thought that the spring was too stiff for my weight. i spoke to Dan Kyle in great length about the subject at hand, and he was very kind in taking the time to walk me thru all of the measurements and the like. he thought that the spring was ok given the measurements i gave him. in the end, he could only opine that something was in fact different about the shock (regardless of spring) given the measurements that we gave him over the phone (and visual details of the corresponding parts). i was able to compress a softer spring MORE than the stiffer spring on my bike. for him to be able to recommend a better solution he'd have to either see pictures of the parts (my bike and bromike's 999r) or see the bike in person to evaluate it.
does anyone have any ideas of their own as to what might be wrong with my suspension? could it be the internals? is it just the spring that is too stiff, but then why could i compress my bike more than my buddy's with a softer spring? is it in the rebound/compression settings? i'd be surprised given that in-house suspension just adjusted it based on their findings (although they said to ride it then report back, which i did, and it was improved but not perfect).
thoughts?
thanks in advance
2003 999r "my bike"....i am 176lbs without gear
ohlins 1091-34-100
shock compressed to 10mm preload
-static sag = 6mm
-loaded sag = 28mm
compression: 17 clicks out (i clicked 17 times clockwise til it stopped)
rebound: 11 clicks in (i clicked 11 times counterclockwise til it stopped)
2003 999r "my friend Bromike666's bike"
ohlins 1091-16-64 (much softer spring)
preload: i believe to be 10mm as well
-loaded sag 20mm with ME on it (we didn't measure clicks of rebound or compression as i didn't want to screw with his settings whatsoever). he is heavier than i and achieves much better sag results given his additional weight.
So if our measurements were accurate, i was somehow able to compress his softer spring LESS than my stiffer one. he is able to compress my spring slightly more than i could (again, he is heavier).
everything about the two shock units, linkages, ride height adjusters looked/measured identical to one another, and our swingarms are the same as well. the only thing i couldn't determine were the shock type numbers stamped on the shock towers so to determine if one shock unit was in fact different than the other.
randy at in-house suspension felt that there was something peculiar about the way the bike responded during a recent evaluation (rebounded too quickly, too much gas in the compression unit which he reduced). he thought that the spring was too stiff for my weight. i spoke to Dan Kyle in great length about the subject at hand, and he was very kind in taking the time to walk me thru all of the measurements and the like. he thought that the spring was ok given the measurements i gave him. in the end, he could only opine that something was in fact different about the shock (regardless of spring) given the measurements that we gave him over the phone (and visual details of the corresponding parts). i was able to compress a softer spring MORE than the stiffer spring on my bike. for him to be able to recommend a better solution he'd have to either see pictures of the parts (my bike and bromike's 999r) or see the bike in person to evaluate it.
does anyone have any ideas of their own as to what might be wrong with my suspension? could it be the internals? is it just the spring that is too stiff, but then why could i compress my bike more than my buddy's with a softer spring? is it in the rebound/compression settings? i'd be surprised given that in-house suspension just adjusted it based on their findings (although they said to ride it then report back, which i did, and it was improved but not perfect).
thoughts?
thanks in advance