My buddy and I switched bikes for about 15 miles and the two bikes are very different. He has a 2010 SF 1098 base for reference.
Obviously the 1098 has gobs (ridiculous gobs really) of power and if you have an opportunity to employ it I'm sure it's addicting. Most of my riding was in light traffic on surface streets so I really only got to really twist it for a few miles on the interstate. You can tell that there is enough power on tap to be like the energizer bunny...keeps going and going...but like I say hard to employ. I would like to have some more time to experience all the power on some more open roads when the po po isn't quite so active.
In the handling department I have to give the nod to the 848...no contest. It was almost laborious to get the 1098 to lean over. Maybe that's what it's like to lean a bike with a steering damper, I don't know. It's like the front end weighed another 20 lbs. My Harley Road Glide was easier to throw into a corner than the 1098 was. :abduct: I'm sure it something that you get used to but you could definitely tell that turn in was slower. Maybe when turning at the speed that the 1098 could easily provide, you don't want the bike to be too flickable. :think:
The 1098 is superior when it comes to braking. The monoblocks slow you down quickly with a light touch. It's a very confident feel when slowing whereas the 848 requires more input at the lever. I think the brakes on the 848 are adequate for that bike but I'm going to consider putting monoblocks on the front at least just to get that awesome brake feel.
Suspension is hard to argue. The 848 almost has a Cadillac ride quality but it gets out of hand when pushed. This is mostly due to me being a heavy guy at 235 and the shocks being a little soft. Not a great combination for a sport oriented bike but compared to the shocks on the base SF 1098 there wasn't a whole lot of difference. Ohlins would definitley make a difference but the cost would be substantial.
When it comes to the clutch, the 848 gets the nod for me b/c I can clearly hear the wonderful sounding Termi's, the take-up is smoother and happens sooner than the 1098 does. I don't think the clutch would have been a deciding factor one way or the other for me.
Overall comfort and ability to use the power goes to the 848. It's not the Hooligan that the 1098 is but I'm satisfied with my choice, I'd rather have handling over power. Obviously I could be biased but I could have had either bike and initially didn't want the cost. I'm going to have to make some decisions on whether or not I want to spend the dough to get better shocks and brakes b/c at that point I will have spent as much just about as the 1098.
There's my opinion on the two bikes after a brief ride, I plan to ride the 1098 some more to get a better feel for the bike...and to abuse the power.
Obviously the 1098 has gobs (ridiculous gobs really) of power and if you have an opportunity to employ it I'm sure it's addicting. Most of my riding was in light traffic on surface streets so I really only got to really twist it for a few miles on the interstate. You can tell that there is enough power on tap to be like the energizer bunny...keeps going and going...but like I say hard to employ. I would like to have some more time to experience all the power on some more open roads when the po po isn't quite so active.
In the handling department I have to give the nod to the 848...no contest. It was almost laborious to get the 1098 to lean over. Maybe that's what it's like to lean a bike with a steering damper, I don't know. It's like the front end weighed another 20 lbs. My Harley Road Glide was easier to throw into a corner than the 1098 was. :abduct: I'm sure it something that you get used to but you could definitely tell that turn in was slower. Maybe when turning at the speed that the 1098 could easily provide, you don't want the bike to be too flickable. :think:
The 1098 is superior when it comes to braking. The monoblocks slow you down quickly with a light touch. It's a very confident feel when slowing whereas the 848 requires more input at the lever. I think the brakes on the 848 are adequate for that bike but I'm going to consider putting monoblocks on the front at least just to get that awesome brake feel.
Suspension is hard to argue. The 848 almost has a Cadillac ride quality but it gets out of hand when pushed. This is mostly due to me being a heavy guy at 235 and the shocks being a little soft. Not a great combination for a sport oriented bike but compared to the shocks on the base SF 1098 there wasn't a whole lot of difference. Ohlins would definitley make a difference but the cost would be substantial.
When it comes to the clutch, the 848 gets the nod for me b/c I can clearly hear the wonderful sounding Termi's, the take-up is smoother and happens sooner than the 1098 does. I don't think the clutch would have been a deciding factor one way or the other for me.
Overall comfort and ability to use the power goes to the 848. It's not the Hooligan that the 1098 is but I'm satisfied with my choice, I'd rather have handling over power. Obviously I could be biased but I could have had either bike and initially didn't want the cost. I'm going to have to make some decisions on whether or not I want to spend the dough to get better shocks and brakes b/c at that point I will have spent as much just about as the 1098.
There's my opinion on the two bikes after a brief ride, I plan to ride the 1098 some more to get a better feel for the bike...and to abuse the power.