Joined
·
5,133 Posts
Well the weather and circumstances finally cooperated and let me take my GT1000 out for a ride following the 7,500 mile (Actually 8,000+) service.
As reported on earlier the initial change I noticed was in the sound which was more robust - especially from the airbox. Did BCM change the type of filter? No, they kept it stock. How explain the change in sound? They removed a mouse nest from the airbox.
OK, so how did the bike feel sans mouse? Not a helleva lot lighter. (Side to side transitions seemed identical.) But the valve and belt adjustment along with the balancing of the FI between cylinders made for a small improvement.
Most notably improved were the brakes, which were now completely firm with no air-induced squishiness at all.
The biggest change, however, was in my confidence. Keeping the same belts - even with fairly low mileage - for four seasons is a no no. Knowing that they're new made me feel free to let the bike rev freely.
I don't know how 'off' the valves were, just that some shims/collars were replaced.
All in all the GT runs great. But then again she ran great from the day the Fatduc was installed.
Oh, and that is one small change. The tech apparently lowered the setting of the Fatduc some. Enough so that she was a bit lean just off throttle when the enrichment circuit first turned off. Ran fine above the transition and perfectly everywhere once she was completely warmed up.
The GT1000 is a keeper. (Good thing for me with my aging hips)

-don
As reported on earlier the initial change I noticed was in the sound which was more robust - especially from the airbox. Did BCM change the type of filter? No, they kept it stock. How explain the change in sound? They removed a mouse nest from the airbox.
OK, so how did the bike feel sans mouse? Not a helleva lot lighter. (Side to side transitions seemed identical.) But the valve and belt adjustment along with the balancing of the FI between cylinders made for a small improvement.
Most notably improved were the brakes, which were now completely firm with no air-induced squishiness at all.
The biggest change, however, was in my confidence. Keeping the same belts - even with fairly low mileage - for four seasons is a no no. Knowing that they're new made me feel free to let the bike rev freely.
I don't know how 'off' the valves were, just that some shims/collars were replaced.
All in all the GT runs great. But then again she ran great from the day the Fatduc was installed.
Oh, and that is one small change. The tech apparently lowered the setting of the Fatduc some. Enough so that she was a bit lean just off throttle when the enrichment circuit first turned off. Ran fine above the transition and perfectly everywhere once she was completely warmed up.
The GT1000 is a keeper. (Good thing for me with my aging hips)
-don