Ducati.ms - The Ultimate Ducati Forum banner

1 - 20 of 25 Posts

·
Old Wizard
Joined
·
3,000 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
How about a free front magnesium wheel with your next tire purchase?

Consider this:

3.5 x 17 Wheel Weights:

Ducati OEM aluminum 5-spoke .... 9.25 lbs
Marchesini magnesium 5-spoke ... 6.80 lbs
Weight Savings ................. 2.45 lbs


120/70ZR17 Tire Weights (Sport Rider Magazine June 2002)

Dunlop D207RR ............... 10.44 lbs
Pirelli Super Corsa............. 8.38 lbs
Weight Savings ................. 2.06 lbs

Dunlop D207RR ............... 10.44 lbs
Bridgestone BT-010 .......... 8.81 lbs
Weight Savings ................. 1.63 lbs

This seemingly small weight difference between the heaviest Dunlops and the lighter Bridgestones is even more important than a larger weight savings at the wheel.

Simply stated, the rotational inertia of a wheel or tire is proportional to the square of the distance the weight is placed from the axle. Because of this square-effect, the tire weight has more effect on the rotational inertia of the wheel-tire combination mainly because of its somewhat greater distance from the axle.

Consequently, a 1.6 - 2 lbs. lighter front tire will give you the same handling improvement that you get by switching from an aluminum to a magnesium wheel.

Looking at it another way, you can negate the handling benefits of expensive light weight wheels by switching to a heavier tire.

This is also the best argument for choosing aftermarket wheels that have carbon fiber rims. When compared to all-magnesium wheels with the same weight, a carbon fiber rimmed wheel will have significantly lower rotational inertia that results in improved acceleration and handling.

(The similar construction of rear tires results in weight savings of less than a pound so you'll see a lesser improvement effect there.)

I'm not saying that tires should be chosen based on weight alone but given the very similar performance of high performance street tires, why not take the free mag wheel?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
66 Posts
Shazaam said:
How about a free front magnesium wheel with your next tire purchase?

Consider this:

3.5 x 17 Wheel Weights:

Ducati OEM aluminum 5-spoke .... 9.25 lbs
Marchesini magnesium 5-spoke ... 6.80 lbs
Weight Savings ................. 2.45 lbs


120/70ZR17 Tire Weights (Sport Rider Magazine June 2002)

Dunlop D207RR ............... 10.44 lbs
Pirelli Super Corsa............. 8.38 lbs
Weight Savings ................. 2.06 lbs

Dunlop D207RR ............... 10.44 lbs
Bridgestone BT-010 .......... 8.81 lbs
Weight Savings ................. 1.63 lbs

This seemingly small weight difference between the heaviest Dunlops and the lighter Bridgestones is even more important than a larger weight savings at the wheel.

Simply stated, the rotational inertia of a wheel or tire is proportional to the square of the distance the weight is placed from the axle. Because of this square-effect, the tire weight has more effect on the rotational inertia of the wheel-tire combination mainly because of its somewhat greater distance from the axle.

Consequently, a 1.6 - 2 lbs. lighter front tire will give you the same handling improvement that you get by switching from an aluminum to a magnesium wheel.

Looking at it another way, you can negate the handling benefits of expensive light weight wheels by switching to a heavier tire.

This is also the best argument for choosing aftermarket wheels that have carbon fiber rims. When compared to all-magnesium wheels with the same weight, a carbon fiber rimmed wheel will have significantly lower rotational inertia that results in improved acceleration and handling.

(The similar construction of rear tires results in weight savings of less than a pound so you'll see a lesser improvement effect there.)

I'm not saying that tires should be chosen based on weight alone but given the very similar performance of high performance street tires, why not take the free mag wheel?
Brilliant!! :D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
989 Posts
Well there you go... Thanks for that info.. funny how much sense it makes. Pity the comparison was to an BT010 which was supersceeded a while ago.

Shazaam, have you ever weighed into the CF v mag wheel debates ??

Hoping you are the same...


Mal
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,890 Posts
Pirelli lists the weight of each tire they sell in their brochure:
http://www.us.pirelli.com/en_US/browser/attachments/pdf/PIRELLI_FULL_07.pdf

For example, the Diablo Supercorsa:
120/60ZR17: 9.02 lbs
180/55ZR17: 12.76 lbs
190/55ZR17: 13.86 lbs

Supercorsa Pro:
160/60ZR 17: 12.13 lbs

So, going from a 180 to a 190 on the rear will slow you down because there is over 1 pound of very important weight added.

There isn't much difference between the various models within each catagory of tire. For example, there isn't much difference between a 180 Supercorsa and a Corsa III or a plain Diablo. There is a big difference between the Strada line and the Diablo line though.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,890 Posts
The moment of inertia is directly proportional to the mass, assuming the tires are the same shape and size. So, we can just use percentages based on the differences in mass of the tires, assuming the wheels are the same.

For the Pirelli vs the Dunlop front tires, there is a 0.74 lb difference. Choosing Dunlop over Pirelli means a (0.74/9.02) = 8% reduction in the moment of inertia. Maybe that's not significant, I don't know.

For the 160 series rear tires there is a 2% difference, with the advantage to Dunlop.

Basically this means that the rear wheel will accelerate 2% faster, and the front wheel will accelerate 8% faster with Dunlops vs. Pirellis. Likewise, I believe that the front wheel will steer with 8% less force as well.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,890 Posts
OK, I heard from Bridgestone:

BT016 weights:

120/60ZR17 – 7.6lb

160/60ZR17 – 10.7lb

180/55ZR17 – 12.3lb

190/55ZR17 – 15.0lb

wow, some of these are very light!
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,890 Posts
Michlen Pilot Power 2CT:

front: 9.21 lbs
180 rear: 12.62 lbs
190 rear: 14.6 lbs

So, much heavier for the front, but about the same for the rears, as the Bridgestones.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
259 Posts
back form the dead.

i weighed the pilot power 2ct and bridgestone bt016 today.

pilot power 2ct
120/70/17
9 lbs 6 oz.

180/55/17
12lbs 0 oz.

bt016
120/70/17
9 lbs 5 oz.

180/55/17
13lbs 12 oz.

they were weighed on a digital hanging scale.i'm glad i could weigh them before buying, cause i thought the Stones were going to be lighter.
 

·
Come in Spinner :)
Joined
·
7,323 Posts
So hang your Michelins on a pair of mag wheels and your made.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14 Posts
How about an update?

It has been a few years since this thread was updated with some of the newer tires available from the various manufacturers. It would be great if someone with access to tires could throw up some weights for the following brands in sizes 120/60 or 120/70 ZR17 front AND 180/55 ZR17 rear:
Michelin Power Cup EVO
Michelin Power RS
Bridgestone Battlax RS10
Pirelli Diablo Supercorsa SP V2 or SC V2
Dunlop Sportmax Q3
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14 Posts
Update: Pirelli Diablo Supercorsa SP V2

Just got two new tires and weighed them before installation: Pirelli Diablo Supercorsa SP V2
120/70ZR17: 9.5 lbs
180/55ZR17: 12.5 lbs

Any others?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
838 Posts
Fresh from Dunlop...
Q3 front 120/70/17 10lbs
Q3 rear 180/55/17 14lbs
 
1 - 20 of 25 Posts
Top