Ducati.ms - The Ultimate Ducati Forum - Reply to Topic
Thread: Akrapovic Full System on a 2016 DVT Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ducati.ms - The Ultimate Ducati Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
Jun 14th, 2019 9:26 pm
zr1000a1 BIG WARNING!!! It may be important for someone considering Rapidbike for 1260. The new harness puts the device on top of the battery. The harness is not long enough to move the device under the passenger's seat (like 1200). Unfortunately, the rider seat will NOT fit in lower position with Rapidbike!!!
I tried all possible locations for the device - nothing works. The only way I see is to buy a smaller Lithium battery and stuck Rapidbike between the battery and the frame.
Not an issue for me as I use the seat in high position, just FYI.
May 8th, 2019 6:21 pm
DarR Very interesting discussion and @AXSPwr highlighted what we should have remembered namely the operation of open vs closed loop. Thanks for that.
Now I'm really stoked to install my Rapidbike to my Multi 1260 which, I rode for the first time today.
Fast ship but the engine's power is nowhere near visceral as my Monster 1200R. No complaints as it's a different bike for a different purpose.
BTW, the Monster operates in open loop only (o2 disabled) following a Rexxer ECU flash.
May 8th, 2019 2:25 pm
zr1000a1 Thanks AXSPwr! I think there is a lot of truth in what you say. RapidBike came preset for a stock exhaust. I never used it with stock, so I can't be 100% sure, but if we assume that the pre-installed maps are correct for stock (with cat) system, then looking at the adaptive values (I attached the values for both cylinders), RapidBike clearly tries to lean A/F in "low-mid RPM range/partially open throttle" with full Akra exhaust. That means the bike does actually run a bit rich in closed loop.



May 8th, 2019 1:30 pm
AXSPwr
Quote:
Originally Posted by zr1000a1 View Post
This is just to bust the myth (very popular among some members here) that if you install a full exhaust on Multistrada 1260 the bike will run lean. THIS IS NOT TRUE! Stock ECU perfectly compensates the difference. If nothing else, the bike is actually running a bit rich.

Trimmed for easier reading.
I don't have a dog in this fight one way or another, but I don't think it's entirely accurate to extrapolate the conclusion reached from the data provided. A dyno run is performed by taking a vehicle from idle to wide open throttle (WOT) in smooth but rapid fashion, and leaving it there until it reaches max RPM. At WOT, a fuel injected engine is running in open loop injection mode, ignoring the inputs of the oxygen (lambda) sensors, vs closed loop where the o2 sensors are used to fine tune the fuel/air ratio in near real time. The A/F readings on a dyno chart are provided by a wide-band o2 sensor placed inside the exhaust by the dyno operator. Closed loop is used during partial throttle application to achieve better emissions and gas mileage, while open loop is used during WOT to ensure the safe operation of the motor.

In other words, while running WOT, a fuel injected engine is running a fixed timing map read directly from the ECU. Changes to the exhaust system will have zero impact on this fuel map, so the only way a cat-less exhaust could make an engine run lean WOT would be improved harvesting from the head, combined with imperfect valve control. Not to mention, since every production vehicle uses an open-loop map that's a little bit rich for engine safety, even if those conditions existed, it still wouldn't likely result in a critically lean engine.

Partial throttle, though, is where we run into a problem without a tune, and sometimes even with one. The factory lambda sensors are programmed to operate within a range; being narrow band sensors they can't cope with oxygen levels that are way outside their normal operating condition. With a catalyzed exhaust these sensors are between the head and the catalyst; a controlled environment where such a narrow band sensor can work well. Remove the catalyst, and that sensor is open to the world. The level of oxygen detected by said sensor will increase, often outside it's operating range. If so, the ECU will throw a code, but if not, the o2 sensor will tell the engine that there is unused oxygen in the exhaust (lean), and the ECU will send more fuel to the injectors. So the common result of adding a cat-less exhaust on an untuned engine is an over-rich mixture during non-WOT operation, and a resulting net loss of power, not to mention a filthy running engine that gets poor fuel mileage. Most tuners will not resolve this issue either, because they only interact with the open-loop tables. In fact, many tuners disable the lambda sensors entirely, defaulting the closed-loop tables to under-timed settings designed to protect the engine. RapidBike is an exception in this area, at least that's their claim.

This is a complex topic and I'm certainly not suggesting everything you posted is inaccurate, I just don't think it paints a complete picture. In all likelyhood, if an owner installs an uncatalyzed exhaust on their MTS without a tune, they will experience no issue at WOT, as your dyno runs indicate. During partial throttle application, the engine will probably run rich, make less power, get poorer fuel economy, and have somewhat lower exhaust and engine temperatures due to the rich mixture. This isn't a condition likely to damage the engine, true. On the other hand, there are secondary changes that come with an uncatalyzed exhaust, such as those lower exhaust temps, that can have an opposite effect on the lambda sensors, resulting in a lean condition. How closed-loop fuel management deals with all of these parameters is basically unknowable to the layperson, so while we can say it's not normal for removing the catalyst to result in a lean condition, it's certainly not impossible either.

tl;dr: Unless you plan on running WOT all the time, you should get your race exhaust system tuned, and use a system that can work with the lambda sensors, not just disable them.
May 8th, 2019 9:57 am
eppy
Quote:
Originally Posted by stegegjerdet View Post
Hi, how did it go with the dominator? Seems ok? How about the noise? Needs db killer?
I still haven't installed it yet, the quality seems amazing for the price.
May 8th, 2019 8:28 am
DarR
Quote:
Originally Posted by zr1000a1 View Post
Me too. I was expecting it to run lean.
I still think that RapidBike worth the money. The bike runs a bit smoother, also like reduced engine braking (I got RB Racing) and additional 8HP is nice to have as well
The Rapidbike is a great unit. It did smooth the surging my Panigale had in the lower part of the RPM band.
Huge differences in HP on your charts. Can't wait to experiment myself as posted in the "1260 is too smooth" thread.
May 8th, 2019 7:33 am
zr1000a1
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarR View Post
I'm shocked
Me too. I was expecting it to run lean.
I still think that RapidBike worth the money. The bike runs a bit smoother, also like reduced engine braking (I got RB Racing) and additional 8HP is nice to have as well
May 8th, 2019 7:05 am
DarR
Quote:
Originally Posted by zr1000a1 View Post
This is just to bust the myth (very popular among some members here) that if you install a full exhaust on Multistrada 1260 the bike will run lean. THIS IS NOT TRUE! Stock ECU perfectly compensates the difference. If nothing else, the bike is actually running a bit rich.

As you can clearly see, there is no danger of running full exhaust system without any fuel adjustments whatsoever. As I said many times - you need a tuning only when you want to get the most out of the mods. Otherwise you are absolutely safe without any ECU changes.
Just one note. I have noise damper (DB killer) installed. And the bike runs on rich side. I think, without the dumper it will run spot on! And whoever thinks that Akra statement about ECU tuning not required with their full system is FALSE - THINK AGAIN!
I'm shocked
May 1st, 2019 6:03 pm
stegegjerdet Hi, how did it go with the dominator? Seems ok? How about the noise? Needs db killer?

Quote:
Originally Posted by eppy View Post
I just installed the slip-on version this weekend, the Dominator de-cat showed up Tuesday.
I'm going to hold off on the De-cat till I order the rabid bike system.

I had to trim the carbon shield also, that and I didn't use the spacers on the hanger.
If I used the spacers my side pannier would not mount.

I'm mildly disappointed in Akra since the listing clearly states they work with the panniers.
Apr 22nd, 2019 4:02 pm
slydrite Subscibed
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome