Static sag on Hyper S forks - Ducati.ms - The Ultimate Ducati Forum
http://www.ducati.ms/forums
» Insurance
» Sponsors
Go Back   Ducati.ms - The Ultimate Ducati Forum > Ducati Motorcycle Forums > HyperMotard

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jul 9th, 2008, 6:50 am   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shrewsbury, Shropshire, Uk
Posts: 336
Static sag on Hyper S forks

Hi Chaps...greetings from across the pond and to our european brothers and sisters, from across the puddle...

Now, I've had my suspension dialed in and it seems a lot better although the front seems a bit pattery at times. I just wondered what static sag others were running mine is 30mm.

Replies on a postcard or foreign telegram preferred but if that is not possible then on here will do.

Ta in advance.
Karlr is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old Jul 9th, 2008, 9:15 am   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
GHEZZI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ipswich, Qld, Australia
Posts: 602
Firstly static sag is just the weight of the bike alone and that is not the important figure, RIDER SAG which includes you in all your finery is the one that you must first measure and then set by adjustment. From fully extended (topped out) to where it settles.

Then measure static sag (bike on it's own, fully extended to settled), this figure will then tell you if the spring rate is too hard or too soft.

Most bike shops talk of 30mm rider sag and 5-7mm static sag. In this scenario if your static is more than 7mm the spring could be too hard, if it's less than 5mm it could be too soft. I know that sounds wrong but it's all to do with the amount of pre-load we wind on/off to get the initial rider sag of 30mm.When installed, the spring should also have at least 15-25mm pre-load applied to it's free length.

However, there is a theory that rider sag should be set between 20% and 30% of total travel. Compare a V-ROD at 50mm rear wheel travel and say a KTM 300EXC which has more than 300mm of rear travel. If you set them both at 30mm rider sag the Harley would bottom everywhere and the KTM would toss you over the bars.

Then Ohlins website states: Rider sag front 35-50mm and static front 15-30mm.

If we apply the 20-30% rule to a Hypers 165mm travel (along fork axis) we end up with 33-49.5mm which is very close to Ohlins theory. But now we have a new problem.

The bike shop theory of 30mm and 5-7mm has static sag at around 20% of total or rider sag, but Ohlins theory has static at between 43 and 60%. Go figure???

So after all that confusing mumbo jumbo, it is a black art you know? This is what I am going to do, until advised otherwise by a REAL expert.

Hyper rear wheel travel is 141mm X 28.5% = 40mm (rider sag), X 20% = 8mm (static sag).
Hyper front fork travel is 165mm X 28.5% = 47mm (rider sag), X 20% = 9.5mm (static sag).

In the 20% to 30% theory, 20% represents the harder end of the scale most suited to racing, while 30% represents the softer end of the scale for touring. My choice of using 28.5% is just a starting point based on a personal preference of setting up for rough road use and not a race track. In the final outcome I may differ from these greatly as all we are trying to achieve here is a BASE SETTING where the bike is balanced. From there, only time, personal preference and feeeeeling will tell. Ciao.
__________________
I've got HDD, HYPER-ACTIVITY DEFICIT DISORDER
GHEZZI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9th, 2008, 9:32 am   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shrewsbury, Shropshire, Uk
Posts: 336
Ahhh thanks..I know you have posted extensively on this before and I have agreed with your posts finding them valuable.

However, I was at the track the other week and got my bike set up by http://www.setupengineering.co.uk/index2.php .... James told me that the only point, initially of setting rider sag was if you were going to change the spring rate ....so he said that static sag was more important and advised 15mm at the rear and about 30 at the front.

So that's why I'm asking...about static sag only.

Cheers
Karlr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9th, 2008, 9:38 am   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shrewsbury, Shropshire, Uk
Posts: 336
So I guess if I have 30mm at the front I would need to harden up a little but it seems like I should be doing the opposite.

My bike was set up at 5mm rear static sag...which was too hard I guess.
Karlr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9th, 2008, 12:03 pm   #5 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karlr View Post
So I guess if I have 30mm at the front I would need to harden up a little but it seems like I should be doing the opposite.

My bike was set up at 5mm rear static sag...which was too hard I guess.
Hello Karl. I'm Swedish so you have to exuse my bad english
My HMs settings from the box was zero static sag on rear and 50mm on the front. My weight is around 65kg naked. I now run this settings.

Rear static sag 10mm and with me in full dress 30mm.
Front static sag 32mm and with me 44mm.

This work quit well on bad roads maybe i have to rise the ride hight on the rear. To make it turn in faster but i'ts not really bother me. I like a soft setting so I can feel what the bike is doing. But I ride it like a stolen One thing about this bike i have found out is..you really have to ride as you stolen it. The better the suspension is working, like on mx-bikes.

Forza HyperMotard

Falappa
Falappa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9th, 2008, 4:03 pm   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shrewsbury, Shropshire, Uk
Posts: 336
THanks Falappa,

Your English is much better than my Swedish :-). This is what the man at setup said. You need to let the suspension operate. I am coming to the same conclusion as you, it moves around a bit but it works better when on the gas. I have the 2 into 1 termi. It's an awesome bit of kit the hypermotard..a rush everytime I go out.
Karlr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9th, 2008, 6:28 pm   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
GHEZZI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ipswich, Qld, Australia
Posts: 602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karlr View Post
I was at the track the other week and got my bike set up by http://www.setupengineering.co.uk/index2.php .... James told me that the only point, initially of setting rider sag was if you were going to change the spring rate ....so he said that static sag was more important and advised 15mm at the rear and about 30 at the front. So that's why I'm asking...about static sag only. Cheers
Firstly let me state, I am no expert! But every expert I talk to has a different opinion or advice. So I can only advise that you stick with James until you are not satisfied with the outcome, but you will need to experiment a little.

On his advice "The only point, initially of setting rider sag was if you were going to change the spring rate". I can see his point and I have done that to determine if the original spring rate is in the ball park for my weight.

At 65kg you would definitely benefit from lighter spring weights, here that would cost about AUD$400 plus fitting. Your call, keep us posted.
__________________
I've got HDD, HYPER-ACTIVITY DEFICIT DISORDER
GHEZZI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 10th, 2008, 12:27 am   #8 (permalink)
AXE
Senior Member
 
AXE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Posts: 1,750
If I were to use the 20-30% rule, my front would clock in around 25.5% and my rear would be 23.5%. I think having the rear a little stiffer and the front a little softer helps keep the front planted and eliminated the twitchy front end.

Here are my settings that I posted a while back. I have messed with the compression and rebound a click or so, but this works well for me.

Suspension Settings

Out!
__________________
2008 Ducati Hypermotard
AXE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 10th, 2008, 7:04 am   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shrewsbury, Shropshire, Uk
Posts: 336
Thanks Axe / Ghezzi..All these suspension guys seem to have a diffrent angle. I reckon I'll go a little softer on the front. Axe do you have static sag settings?
Karlr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 10th, 2008, 8:59 am   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
shat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort walton Beach, Florida, USA
Posts: 281
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Falappa View Post
My weight is around 65kg naked.
Falappa
Jeeze, Falappa. That's a little more then we needed to know.
shat is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ST3 Suspension Upgrades - Forks Ducati23 Sport Touring 29 Mar 18th, 2011 7:29 pm
ST4 forks on the WASPmobile - Ride report wasp1000 Sport Classic 9 Oct 9th, 2008 7:50 am
Setting rear ride height on PS BobHancock Sport Classic 19 Apr 21st, 2008 12:49 am
Report on 900SS forks on GT MajorSoftie Sport Classic 6 Apr 4th, 2008 11:30 am
what bikes did you own prior to the hyper? booger weldz HyperMotard 49 Mar 10th, 2008 1:15 am

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:41 pm.



Ducati.ms Web Community is powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Motorcycle News, Videos and Reviews
Ducati Forum Harley Davidson Honda 600RR Kawasaki Forum Yamaha R6
1199 Panigale Roadglide Forum Honda CBR1000 Vulcan Forum Yamaha R1
Ducati Monster Harley Forums Honda CBR250R ZX10R Forum Star Raider
Suzuki GSXR V-Rod Forums Honda Shadow Kawasaki Motorcycles Star Warrior
SV650 Forum BMW S1000RR Honda Fury Kawasaki Versys Drag Racing
Suzuki V-Strom BMW K1600 Triumph Forum Victory Forums Sportbikes
Volusia Forum BMW F800 Triumph 675 MV Agusta Forum Streetfighters