» Site Navigation |
|
»
»
»
» Motorcycle Forums
|
» Buyers Guide |
|
|
» Our Partners |
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 30th, 2012, 8:18 am
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 84
|
Getting some Metzeler M5's for my '94 900SS CR. What size?
Howdy--I have a '94 900SS CR with the stock rear wheel.
Here are the options:
120/60 ZR 17 M/C (55W) TL
110/70 ZR 17 M/C 54W TL
120/70 ZR 17 M/C (58W) TL
190/50 ZR 17 M/C (73W) TL
200/50 ZR 17 M/C (75W) TL
180/55 ZR 17 M/C (73W) TL
190/55 ZR 17 M/C (75W) TL
150/60 ZR 17 M/C 66W TL
160/60 ZR 17 M/C (69W) TL
170/60 ZR 17 M/C (72W) TL
I'm thinking:
120/70 ZR 17 M/C (58W) TL (for better protection from NYC's bumps than a 60-series
160/60 ZR 17 M/C (69W) TL (I think that's the stock size. Is a 170 better? Would it rub? I like the idea of a narrow 160...)
Am I looking at the right sizes?
Any advice much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
Jan 30th, 2012, 9:00 am
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Radar tends to harsh my mellow.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Posts: 5,801
|
Well, not related to size but I tried them lat year for my trip to the Dragon. They don't like being cold and are like being on ice when new, they wear out extremely fast and have a slightly heavy feel to the steering. I replaced them with the sport touring Z8 and like them better in every way. Just my opinion of course.
__________________
Mike
2006 999, 2007 ST3S, 2007 S2R1000
|
|
|
Jan 30th, 2012, 10:22 am
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Humble
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lowville, NY, USA
Posts: 13,092
|
Nick, your sizes are right, and for the right reasons.
|
|
|
Jan 30th, 2012, 12:28 pm
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 366
|
the 170 fits kinda weird on the 4.5, it tends to go very steep around the tire edge.
|
|
|
Jan 30th, 2012, 2:21 pm
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: philadelphia, Pa, usa
Posts: 27
|
5.5" rim
you do mention something about liking a narrow rear tire, so this might seem silly, but my vote is to get the SS/SP (or monster or later SS) rear wheels which are readily available at which point the larger tire sizes fit better.
__________________
Chris Moore
2001 M900Sie
1996 900ss/sp
|
|
|
Jan 30th, 2012, 4:27 pm
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: manchester, michigan, usa
Posts: 878
|
Size of rear tire rubbing depends on the Brand of the Tire, I have a 99 SS and 180 rear is what I went with on my bike. Michelins PP CT2 the dunlop 180 rear would not work.
__________________
1999 Ducati 900SS
______________
1999 Ducati 750M(sold)
2001 1200 HD (sold) owned 1 week
1982 650 Honda (sold) 1978 - GT 550 Suzuki. D.O.A. Cement wall, Diesel Fuel on Road. 
1978 YZ250 (sold)
John Deere 42"
enjoy life ride a duc today.
|
|
|
Jan 30th, 2012, 6:54 pm
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne, , Australia
Posts: 61
|
The bike is designed to run the tyre sizes recomended by Ducati,
Standard sizes are the go...
|
|
|
Jan 31st, 2012, 4:28 am
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil Dwarf
The bike is designed to run the tyre sizes recomended by Ducati,
Standard sizes are the go...
|
Beat me to it.
There is no need whatsoever to go outside of the recommended sizes. People only put wider tyres on for looks.
|
|
|
Feb 2nd, 2012, 6:36 pm
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Elora, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 35
|
I agree with the other advice to keep to stock sizes (120/60 and 160/60).
I tried to put a 120/70 on my CR once and had clearance issues, which is to say I got the axle in, but the wheel wouldn't turn.
|
|
|
Feb 3rd, 2012, 1:59 pm
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gladstone, MO, USA
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Horsey
I agree with the other advice to keep to stock sizes (120/60 and 160/60).
I tried to put a 120/70 on my CR once and had clearance issues, which is to say I got the axle in, but the wheel wouldn't turn.
|
I also tried out non-stock sizes and had mixed results but for slightly different reasons than those listed above.
I selected a 120/70 front for rim protection and was astonished at how badly the bike turned-in afterward, it just fell into full lean with no confidence it wasn't going to keep on falling. Went back to a 120/60 and feeling returned to normal again, both tires were Bridgestone BT-016s so should have been the same profile.
I might have been able to massage the triple clamp height to make it work better but I needed a new 120/70 front on my other bike too so it was easier just to swap it over and get the right size rather than hope I could dial it in.
Out back I run a 170/60 on a 4.5" rim and am quite happy with how that works, turns in better than a 180/55 on 5.5", in my experience.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
Advertisement
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|