Monster Evo Dyno

[rubbersidedown]

I had the bike broke in on the dyno when I bought it, and after they ran it 50 miles or so they pulled some #'s 82.4 hp and 61.9 ft/lbs. Anyone else have theirs dynoed? I havent seen any other #'s online, so just curious. peak hp was about 7750 rpm, where torque was 6000 rpm

[jegnorgeducati]

how does a 1100cc twin only get 82 whp?

[Cesare57]

Originally Posted by rubbersidedown

I had the bike broke in on the dyno when I bought it, and after they ran it 50 miles or so they pulled some #'s 82.4 hp and 61.9 ft/lbs. Anyone else have theirs dynoed? I havent seen any other #'s online, so just curious. peak hp was about 7750 rpm, where torque was 6000 rpm

I have a GT, so my frame of reference is mostly the dyno results the guys on the Sport Classic forum post. It seems like stock Sport Classics tend to show around 78-80 hp at the rear wheel, as opposed to the 92 at the crank the specs show. Based on this, your results seems low for a bike that's supposed to turn 100 hp at the crank. Assuming you had it dynoed at the shop where you bought it, did you ask them if those figures sounded right?

[CrimsonCloak]

Originally Posted by jegnorgeducati

how does a 1100cc twin only get 82 whp?

Well you could put a 20hp nitrous shot on your 1100 Shadow and maybe get there. /kidding


Every Dyno reads differently, sometimes by a lot. 82 is a reasonable number for a DS1000/1100 on most dynos, the SC / HYM read lower because the airbox design is more restrictive. I'd expect a few more out of an EVO, but not until you get more miles on it. It is no where near broken in at 50 miles and it will perk up as you get some more miles. Sometimes by quite a bit.

[rubbersidedown]

I had the same dealer dyno it that I bought it from,and was done before I ever rode it. I thought the numbers were a little low. I was assuming it would be closer to 85-87 hp but figured new motor/ecu need time to break in. Dealer said as everything seats and gets broken in, it should produce more power. I also just picked it up from the 600 mile service yesterday and they said there was an update to the fuel mapping, that they installed and bike now runs smoother in the lower rpm range. so maybe that could have been a component to it as well.

[SDRider]

Originally Posted by rubbersidedown

I had the same dealer dyno it that I bought it from,and was done before I ever rode it. I thought the numbers were a little low. I was assuming it would be closer to 85-87 hp but figured new motor/ecu need time to break in. Dealer said as everything seats and gets broken in, it should produce more power. I also just picked it up from the 600 mile service yesterday and they said there was an update to the fuel mapping, that they installed and bike now runs smoother in the lower rpm range. so maybe that could have been a component to it as well.

I have about 1200 miles on mine already and noticed it runs a lot smoother now and pulls harder as it is breaking in. I love this bike.

[DoWorkSon]

Originally Posted by rubbersidedown

I had the bike broke in on the dyno when I bought it, and after they ran it 50 miles or so they pulled some #'s 82.4 hp and 61.9 ft/lbs. Anyone else have theirs dynoed? I havent seen any other #'s online, so just curious. peak hp was about 7750 rpm, where torque was 6000 rpm

I would expect higher numbers...

Considering my little 696 pulled 72HP with just a tune, pod filters, and exhaust

[chris900ssie]

my old 900ssie had 86 Bhp with dialed cams, mapped and filter and exhaust.

so i would expect MUCH more.