» Site Navigation |
|
»
»
»
» Motorcycle Forums
|
|
 |
Jun 29th, 2009, 10:14 am
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Posts: 7
|
Differences 2003 ST4s and 2004 ST4s
What is the difference between the 2003 and 2004??
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
Jun 29th, 2009, 10:25 am
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dundee, IL, USA
Posts: 392
|
2004 had improved headlights; many with 2002-2003 replace stock system with aftermarket DD design system as teh stock beams were not bright at all. 2004 has a less stretched out seating position and sdjustable clip-on height. Also has a more comfortable seat. Another difference is the dash. 2002-2003 has all analog gauges while 2004 and later had analog tach and digital speedo. I believe these are most of the differences as suspension and engine were unchanged.
|
|
|
Jun 29th, 2009, 10:49 am
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Still needs a life.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Edmonds (near Seattle), WA, USA
Posts: 9,979
|
The upper fairing and windscreen of the MY 04 are different than the 03 and much more aerodynamic. The middle fairing of the MY 04 can be removed without removing the dash, side mirrors, and upper fairing. That was not the case with the earlier models. Anyone who has ever tried to access the battery can appreciate this change.
Both model years came with a OEM 38T rear sprocket, which needs to be immediately changed to a 42T or 43T one for smooth performance at US street and highway legal (and near legal) speeds.
__________________
Bill Anderson & Darkwing Duc (06-ST3s, black) Edmonds, WA. USA
|
|
|
Jun 29th, 2009, 11:01 am
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lincoln, , UK
Posts: 698
|
2004 lost the carbon hugger making the 2003 vastly better
__________________
John
2002 ST4S
Reality is an illusion caused by a lack of alcohol
|
|
|
Jun 29th, 2009, 1:42 pm
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dundee, IL, USA
Posts: 392
|
+1 on the 42T sprocket. That seemed to be the perfect gearing for both road and track riding.
|
|
|
Jun 29th, 2009, 10:23 pm
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rotorua, , New Zealand
Posts: 958
|
Specs state 121HP as opposed to 03 117HP so there must be a minor change in the engine/fuelling somewhere??
__________________

Corse1
03 ST4s ABS
05 999s
|
|
|
Jun 29th, 2009, 10:32 pm
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SF, CA, USA
Posts: 2,491
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corse1
Specs state 121HP as opposed to 03 117HP so there must be a minor change in the engine/fuelling somewhere??
|
The engine is the same throughout the 4s line (excepting the wet clutch in '05). Ducati changed in 2005 to making measurements using an inertial dyno, and the numbers ended up about 4% higher for that year only.
2004 used the same brake dyno as 2003 for measurement, so the '04 vs '03 engine output should be identical on paper.
__________________
Current pastimes:
2007 Sport 1000 SE #84
2004 ST4s
Last edited by SE84; Jun 29th, 2009 at 10:39 pm.
|
|
|
Jun 30th, 2009, 4:34 pm
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rotorua, , New Zealand
Posts: 958
|
Wow thats interesting SE84...wealth of information. With all those same engines you wonder why you can't buy aftermarket belts for our bikes b :-(.......oops is that another thread hijack!
__________________

Corse1
03 ST4s ABS
05 999s
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
Advertisement
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|