» Site Navigation |
|
»
»
»
» Motorcycle Forums
|
» Buyers Guide |
|
|
» Our Partners |
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 13th, 2012, 11:25 am
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mahtomedhi, MN, USA
Posts: 68
|
Ideal valve clearance values
Well, I think I'm through the learning curve with regard to Ducati valve adjustments. The experience hasn't been hard but has been technical. I just wanted to verify the ideal clearances for an ST2: .100 on openers and .000 on closers? I am just wanting to double check before placing my order.
__________________
98 ST2 - STILL stumbles like a drunkard
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
Jan 13th, 2012, 11:34 am
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Mr Leakered
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lynnwood, WA, USA
Posts: 3,904
|
I'm not aware of the ST2 clearances, but just a note. If you are trying to nail those specific clearances, they may not come out right on the first go. I usually end up swapping shims a couple times to get where I want to be.
Have a good one.
__________________
tony b
2001 ST4
|
|
|
Jan 13th, 2012, 1:05 pm
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Check your air pressure!!!
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mathews County, VA, USA
Posts: 4,542
|
I go with LT's recommendations for my ST2.
Openers @ .1mm (.004")
Closers @ <.05mm (< .002")
__________________
AMA Member
1998 Silver ST2$
Eastern Virginia, USA
|
|
|
Jan 13th, 2012, 1:09 pm
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Radar tends to harsh my mellow.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Posts: 5,801
|
What both these dudes said. LT knows stuff and trying to end up dead on target is a bitch. I'm anal as hell about stuff like this but I'm still sane enough to NOT sand shims if they are not .ooo perfect.
__________________
Mike
2006 999, 2007 ST3S, 2007 S2R1000
|
|
|
Jan 13th, 2012, 1:35 pm
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mahtomedhi, MN, USA
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by va duc
I go with LT's recommendations for my ST2.
Openers @ .1mm (.004")
Closers @ <.05mm (< .002")
|
With the closers is it better to be on the .05 end of the range, or closer to .00?
What would "perfect" be considered with regard to performance?
__________________
98 ST2 - STILL stumbles like a drunkard
|
|
|
Jan 13th, 2012, 1:57 pm
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Check your air pressure!!!
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mathews County, VA, USA
Posts: 4,542
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducologist
With the closers is it better to be on the .05 end of the range, or closer to .00?
What would "perfect" be considered with regard to performance?
|
Perfect would be as LT recommends. I am in agreement with Duckman. Given that you can get the shims in .05mm increments I get them as close to spec without sanding the shims, given Ducati's spec at such a wide range you will be close enough. If you get the closer to tight it will cause premature wear and you could bend a valve.
Ducati recommends .03-.20 mm for the closers, so you can see that if you go with .05mm you are very close.
I am no expert, I set them as close as the shims will let me without sanding and ride the piss out of it!
I have also installed the MBP collets as those half rings drove me crazy.
I get all my shims here.
Ducati 2 Valve and 4 Valve Adjustment Shim Kits
__________________
AMA Member
1998 Silver ST2$
Eastern Virginia, USA
|
|
|
Jan 13th, 2012, 2:16 pm
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Greater Worcester Area, Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 1,706
|
If you go with closers at ZERO, I believe you run the risk of wearing the cam/closing rocker finishes. Sero would be "ideal", but it would need to be verified throughout the entire revolution of the cam. And, while you're at it, it would need to maintain the proper clearance for the opening rocker for that revolution also. The cam lobes probably aren't accurate enough to get you there.
__________________
Stick
Try this home-cure-all: Shove a DUC between your legs.
Present DUC: 2003 ST4S Yellow!
Past DUCs: 1998 ST2, 1981 500SL Pantah, 1985 MHR Mille, 1987 Paso Limited, 1995 916 mono
Other brands (past):
1978 BMW R100RS Motosport, 1978 R100S, 1981 Moto Guzzi V50 Monza (wife's bike), and a long list of Hondasakizukis
|
|
|
Jan 13th, 2012, 2:53 pm
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Radar tends to harsh my mellow.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Posts: 5,801
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stick
If you go with closers at ZERO, I believe you run the risk of wearing the cam/closing rocker finishes. Sero would be "ideal", but it would need to be verified throughout the entire revolution of the cam. And, while you're at it, it would need to maintain the proper clearance for the opening rocker for that revolution also. The cam lobes probably aren't accurate enough to get you there.
|
As per LT, zero is when you depress the rocker HARD and can still rotate the shim with your fingers. If you can do this there can be no damage. The clearance increases a the motor warms up.
__________________
Mike
2006 999, 2007 ST3S, 2007 S2R1000
|
|
|
Jan 13th, 2012, 4:53 pm
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Mr Leakered
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lynnwood, WA, USA
Posts: 3,904
|
I guess one could say the info gained from LT's manual is well worth the money. Also, a full shim kit from Mike makes it quite a lot easier.
Have a good one.
__________________
tony b
2001 ST4
|
|
|
Jan 13th, 2012, 6:49 pm
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,145
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckMan
... The clearance increases a the motor warms up.
|
As steel expands when heated, how do the closer clearances increase? The valve stem gets longer, and takes the closer with it? Is this why the opener gap spec is is wider? It gets tighter as the valve stem expands?
__________________
Regards,
Frank, '05 ST3, (Red!!)
"Veni, Vidi,....Ducati!!"
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
Advertisement
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|