» Site Navigation |
|
»
»
»
» Motorcycle Forums
|
» Buyers Guide |
|
|
» Our Partners |
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 22nd, 2011, 8:36 pm
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Moreno Valley, CA, USA
Posts: 7
|
Identification Help-My 1965 Mark 3 Diana'ish Find
Last edited by erockson; Mar 23rd, 2011 at 11:19 am.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
Mar 23rd, 2011, 5:39 am
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kaiserslautern, RP, Germany
Posts: 72
|
Have you looked at the Bevel Heaven website? There is a Data Index listed under the Technical Info section on the left side of the page. This is a simple compilation of info and I'm sure not definitive, but it helps get an idea.
|
|
|
Mar 23rd, 2011, 10:43 am
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Concord, CA, USA
Posts: 269
|
Here is a direct link to the engine # list for singles, please have a look. single cylinder frame/engine #s
You also need to arm yourself with this book called "The Standard Catalog Of Ducati Motorcycles" by Ian Falloon which outlines and shows examples of every scooter and motorcycle Ducati ever produced from the Cucciolo to the 999. Bevel Heaven - Std Catalog
You will find all sorts of info in the book, and the more you read up on and talk to other owners of [especially bevel drive] Ducati motorcycles, you will find that there are no exacts when it comes to what bits were on which models on which years etc. There are only general rules/guides that are mostly true, but there will always be the exceptions to those rules.
__________________
Ciao for now

Steve Allen
BevelHeaven.com ~ It's all about Moto Ducati
(925)798-BEVL[2385] ~ RIDE 'EM, DON'T HIDE 'EM
|
|
|
Mar 23rd, 2011, 11:08 am
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Moreno Valley, CA, USA
Posts: 7
|
Thanks guys. That was one of the sites I had come across in my search to positively identify this bike. My engine # isn't listed of course and the closest 2 are a 1966 Mach 1 (DM2501M1 00529) and an unlisted year 250 Diana Supersport (DM250M1 00648).
Like I said I'm 99% it's a 1965 Mark 3 Diana, but don't know if someone slapped on random parts and then from what bike they are off (scrambler, monza, etc.) The original complete and restored Diana's I've seen all have clip on bars and exposed coil shocks, and I know that color blue that's on the chain guard is incorrect and has to be from another model.
Here's what I'm seeing:
Original 1965 Mark 3 Diana (matches my bike except for handlebar setup and rear shocks)
1965 Monza (has the same shocks and handlebar setup but not the exact height of bars)
Last edited by erockson; Mar 23rd, 2011 at 11:24 am.
|
|
|
Mar 23rd, 2011, 3:58 pm
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hazerswoude, ZH, Holland
Posts: 105
|
the bike you have is worth restoring for sure .
the engine with the DM 250 M1 prefix is a rare ( and valueable ) Mach 1 engine
i doubt that this was the original engine but who cares
build the bike the way you like it
Eldert
|
|
|
Mar 28th, 2011, 1:13 pm
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Long Beach, ca, usa
Posts: 7
|
This is a late Mk3, the M1 engine was installed in these late production USA model Mk3's. Early production USA Mk3's had the M3 engine numbers. All the chassis equipment (including the high handlebars; bars and footpegs were according to buyer preference) is consistent with a late production Mk3 except: shocks (Scrambler/Monza shrouded shocks), control levers look like they might be those british type steel levers (hard to tell by pics) and there's another lever? clamped on the left handlebar that isn't original. The gas tank paint scheme is an earlier Diana type. This might be the larger capacity tank from a ~'64 vintage Diana. Does the tank have the dented area underneath to clear the carb? The headlight rim isn't original. The chainguard paint color is similar to early Dianas. Chainguards had some detail changes from year to year so it would take some investigation to determine if the changuard is correct. You'd have to determine the rim sizes and manufacturer and spoke profile to see if the wheels are original. Missing a few (expensive) parts to complete: carb/manifold, front fender, left toolbox, exhaust and the rust/split cases on the motor are a red flag but absolutely worth the effort to restore to original. MW
|
|
|
Apr 1st, 2011, 10:44 am
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Moreno Valley, CA, USA
Posts: 7
|
Here is the underside of the tank, it doesn't seem to have any indent for the carb. What does that mean? Good, Bad?
|
|
|
Apr 4th, 2011, 5:23 pm
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Long Beach, ca, usa
Posts: 7
|
This is the type of tank that was installed on the 1963-65 Diana. These bikes came with a Del'Lorto SS127A carb. Prior to that the Diana had a UBF carb and the underside of the tank was also different (see Ducati Diana Mania 2010 - www.coolitalianbikes.com for a side-by-side comparison) The later Diana Mk3 had a SS129D installed. The 27 and 29 carbs are similar in size but Ducati saw fit to modify the gas tank to provide more clearance for the 29 carb. Basically, they took a ball peen hammer to the underside of the tank where the carb locates to provide some clearance, then brazed the seam. Your tank doesn't have this modification. Since the bikes that came with the type of tank you have didn't have the frame you have (rearset mounts, triangular tool boxes), I'm inclined to believe the tank isn't strictly catalog original specification, but, Ducati did indulge in building what they had on hand to a certain extent. The " '65" stamped on the brake stay is probably indicative of late '65 production, i.e. a '66 model which fits with all the other bits except for the tank, which is consistent with a '65 model. You could just say it's a transition model, a 65 1/2 if you will, and restore it as you found it. The only issue would be if the SS129D carb will clear the tank. The other conundrum is the M1 engine. Just haven't seen USA production Mk3's with an M1 engine number that early. Might have to rethink the theory on that. Is there any manufacturer iedentification stamped on the rims? All Ducati singles had some type of rim identification. MW
|
|
|
Apr 5th, 2011, 12:11 am
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Moreno Valley, CA, USA
Posts: 7
|
The rims are stamped: M Baruzzo - Torino:
I tried to Google that but noting of any use comes up?
|
|
|
Apr 5th, 2011, 11:00 am
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort walton Beach, Florida, USA
Posts: 281
|
M Baruzzo - Torino Rims
Are aboslutely correct for both Mach Ones and Mark IIIs narrow case sporting models. Treasure them as they are near impossible to find as spares. When you have them rechromed, make sure you use a reputable chromer and one who can follow your instructions to the "T". The engraving/stamping must not be diminished in the restoration process or the value of these parts and accuracy of your restoration will plummet like a rock. Your are very fortunate to have these rims. I've seen them go for as high as $1,500 a pair (or more). Good luck and have fun!
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
Advertisement
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|