» Site Navigation |
|
»
»
»
» Motorcycle Forums
|
» Buyers Guide |
|
|
» Our Partners |
|
|
|
 |
|
Sep 15th, 2006, 12:03 pm
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Roseville, Ca, usa
Posts: 426
|
I added the wrong FUEL!!!
Ok at least it wasnt diesel. I pumped 2 gallons in before i realized that I was pumping in 87 octane and stopped the pump right then.
I rode it home and to work this morning without incedent. Should I add octane boost or just ride it out. I thought about diluting it with 91 but it would still be less than 89 on average so I figured I would ride out the 87 so that it is at least mostly gone. Didnt notice any pinging.
What would you guys do.
Oh BTW it is in and S2R1000 about 1200 miles on the engine
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
Sep 15th, 2006, 12:08 pm
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Lifetime Premium
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 1,167
|
Exactly what you are doing. I'd probably refrain from grabbing a handful of throttle on an uphill run, but other than that I wouldn't sweat it.
Tony
__________________
748/853
|
|
|
Sep 15th, 2006, 12:09 pm
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 158 mile Radius of Road America, , USA
Posts: 410
|
You are ok...you are probably better than ok
I have been running 89 for most of the summer and since my low fuel light doesn't work I run 87 when I need a 'top off' out of my garage lawn tractor supply.
Search these forums...There are several threads on octane that will explain it all.
As long as you don't ping you are better off with lower octane. It will burn better and more completely.
__________________
Mike
[SIZE=2]2000 748 with Ported Heads
Custom 45mm/57mm Yoshimura Half System
Light YTZ27 Yausa Battery
Lightened Internal Gears and Flywheel
O2 sensors, datalogger, PClll and FIM
Various Carbon Bits and R Bodywork
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-George Bernard Shaw
|
|
|
Sep 15th, 2006, 12:10 pm
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sherwood, OR., USA
Posts: 17
|
Alot of Monster riders say that their bikes run better w/ 87 than w/ 92.
|
|
|
Sep 15th, 2006, 12:49 pm
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Still needs a life.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Edmonds (near Seattle), WA, USA
Posts: 9,110
|
I have had to put the occassional tank of 87 octane into my ST4 and ST4s when I was out in the boonies and nothing else was available. I filled up with the good stuff as soon as possible. This did not seem to hurt the bike.
__________________
Bill Anderson & Darkwing Duc (06-ST3s, black) Edmonds, WA. USA
|
|
|
Sep 15th, 2006, 12:58 pm
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Beaverton, OR, USA
Posts: 1,632
|
Don't worry about it! These bikes aren't that particular about the octane.
After reading tons of posts about other peoples experiences, I stopped using 91 over a year ago and switched to 89. Absolutely NO problems and NO pinging. Then, about a month ago, I started using only 87. Again, NO problems.
The only problem with running on 87 is that I can actually feel my ST4s is more responsive and quicker off the mark, which is a problem when you run 15/43 sprockets like I do! I have to pay attention if I don't want to wheelie off every traffic light.
__________________
Mark
2010 WHITE Multistrada 1200s Touring
|
|
|
Sep 15th, 2006, 1:43 pm
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: East Coast, VA, USA
Posts: 882
|
You didn't add the wrong fuel, you added the CORRECT fuel. 87 octane is all you need. My ST4 runs best on 87 octane; best fuel mileage and best throttle response.
Don't waste your money on higher octane fuel - you don't need it. High octane is not the good stuff, it's the expensive stuff.
But... if you think it's better to run higher octane, then run it. If your bike seems to run better with higher octane fuel, use it. It's just that my bike runs perfectly on 87, and it gets the best mileage on 87.
__________________
2001 ST4
BCM-built in 2004. 120RWHP and still running great after 33k. Thanks Bruce!
|
|
|
Sep 15th, 2006, 1:44 pm
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Humble
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lowville, NY, USA
Posts: 13,050
|
+1
|
|
|
Sep 15th, 2006, 2:01 pm
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA, USA
Posts: 204
|
I have to agree that 87 is better. Ran a couple of tanks of 92 and milage went way down about 35mpg. When I went back to 87 the milage went back up to between 50 and 55 mpg. Stick with the 87.
__________________
Leonard
2001 748 The Mistress(Because she always demands more be spent on her)
1981 SR500
Gear, because sweat dries faster than skin heals!
|
|
|
Sep 15th, 2006, 2:26 pm
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Westminster, CO, USA
Posts: 510
|
I haven't run anything BUT 87. Coming up on 6000 miles and no problems.
__________________
2004 749s--in YELLOW!!
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
Advertisement
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|